Hi, are there any solutions to generate Solidity code from UML diagrams?

I found that https://github.com/UrsZeidler/uml2solidity, but it looks like abandoned project.

Are there any tools that have that functionality?

1 ETH block reward will bring ETH in line with the same inflation Bitcoin will have at the next Bitcoin Halving in May- approximately 2%.

Cutting the block reward also improves the stock to flow ratio of ether and equals moon.

Discuss.

1 . DAG size will be >4GB by end of this year (https://investoon.com/tools/dag_size)

1. Majority of miners currently use AMD GPUs with 4GB - so do the E3 ASICS.
   Both(!) won't be able to mine ETH by the end of this year.

2. There may or may be no >4GB asics, considering that BTC is 3x more profitiable to mine and ROI of newer asics wouldn't pay off we can assume there is no significant amount of new ASICS

3. DAG size should not be changed, it deals with the majority amount of ASICS

4. If we implemented ProgPOW we might eliminate a small amount of Asics but also would reduce the costs of an 51% attack even more since many AMD GPUs will be gone as well.

Also take a look at: this (Reddit Post) , this (bitcointalk) and this (cointelegraph)

I can tell that Hudson Jameson has been pushing ProgPOW for quite sometime now. It is obvious. There were devs posting here and other Ethereum related subs that opposed this for quite sometime. It really seems that they sneakily booked this in despite having a lot of people opposing it. Things being done this way cannot possibly bode well to Ethereum's public image. How could you trust such governance?

Some even go on to thinking that it will get rid of ASICs in the network (it won't). Sure, it attempts to level the playing field between ASICs and GPUs but it will only be a matter of 2-3 months before an ASIC gets created for ProgPOW. Things will be back to square one again by then. It's also been highlighted in many previous posts that the hardware audit for ProgPOW identified the Advanced Mining Acceleration Processors by the likes of XTEND. So putting all that together, that makes the algo change worthless and truly a waste of time.

EDIT: Not sure how true the bits mentioned in this article but it cites that even u/vbuterin is at least taken aback by the sudden decision to schedule this.

Personally, I don't care which POW algo gets put in place on the ETH1 chain. The more concerning bit here is how things are being decided/scheduled here. There clearly is no community concensus but it is scheduled? What if ETH2 devs stayed developing the ETHASH chain move that forward instead should there be a fork? Wouldn't all these be more of a complete waste of time and effort causing an unnecessary split?

There are two dapps that I'm particularly interested in using: http://turmsamt.eth/ and http://divvy.eth/

The problem is I don't have anyone to communicate with. I was hoping someone else would be interested in starting up some sort of communication on those (or a different) Dapp platform, because I think they're so cool. Let me know if you want to chat there.

I've looked around quite a bit but was unable to locate any information on how fees will change from 1.0 to 2.0.

Does anyone have an example of how much more efficient calls would be after the 2.0 upgrade is complete? Based on the increased transaction bandwidth I would assume the fees would also be far smaller.

I will configure a Button on my website asking for the new ETH address ownership and using the metamask extension I want it to automatically open a new transaction asking for the fee so it transfer the contract to the new address. Any code to do this? Thank you!

CfP: 3rd CRYPTO VALLEY conference on Blockchain Technology
CVC 2020
https://www.cryptovalleyconference.com/

11th - 12th, June 2020, Rotkreuz, Switzerland

The emergence of Bitcoin and other blockchain-based system allow for entities to trade and interact without trusted third parties. This has led to exciting research in multiple academic disciplines and venues, as well as a vibrant startup rush.

The third CRYPTO VALLEY conference on Blockchain Technology, endorsed by IEEE, aims to unite interested scholars as well as industrial members from all relevant disciplines who study and work in the space of blockchain technology.

Suggested contribution topics include (but are not limited to) empirical and theoretical studies of:

- Attacks on anonymity and privacy
- Big Data and blockchain technology
- Case studies (e.g., of adoption, attacks, forks, scams, …)
- Censorship
- Consensus protocols for blockchains
- Cryptocurrency adoption and economic impacts
- Decentralized applications (Exchanges, Mining Pools, Trading Platforms)
- Blockchain technology for developing countries
- Economics and game theory for blockchains
- Forensics and monitoring
- Formal verification of protocols and smart contracts
- Fraud detection and financial crime prevention
- Governance
- Identity, identification and trust in blockchain systems
- Implications for existing business models
- Interfacing fiat and cryptocurrencies
- Intermediaries in different industries and their future
- Internet of things (IoT) and blockchain technology
- Legal, ethical and societal aspects of (decentralized) virtual currencies
- Measurement studies and methodology
- New applications of blockchain technology
- Off-chain channels and layer-2 scaling
- Peer-to-peer networks
- Permissioned (e.g. Hyperledger) vs. permissionless (e.g. Bitcoin) blockchains
- Privacy and anonymity-enhancing technologies
- Proof-of-X-based consensus
- Regulation and law enforcement
- Relation to other payment systems
- Scalability, sharding, and scalable services for blockchain systems
- Smart contract programming languages and tools
- Transaction graph analysis
- Usability and user studies

We invite the following submissions:

- Full research papers which represent significant and novel research contributions. Submissions must not overlap with works that have been published or that are simultaneously submitted to a journal or a conference with proceedings. Submissions should follow the IEEE Conference Proceedings Format format and should not exceed 10 pages, excluding references and well-marked appendices. There is no limit on the length of the references and appendices. Accepted papers will appear in the IEEE proceedings published by IEEE. Authors who seek to submit their works to journals may opt-out by publishing an extended abstract only.
- Short research papers which may (for example) summarize works-in-progress or extensions to previous research papers. Short research papers must meet the above criteria, except must be 4 pages or less including references and appendices. The title should be of the form "Short Paper: ...".
- Systematization-of-Knowledge papers which present a systematization of the current literature on a specific topic. In line with the definition used by IEEE Security and Privacy, SoK papers must “provide an important new viewpoint on an established, major research area, support or challenge long-held beliefs in such an area with compelling evidence, or present a convincing, comprehensive new taxonomy of such an area. Survey papers without such insights are not appropriate.”. The title should be of the form "SoK: ...".

Submissions should be prepared in IEEE Conference Proceedings Format (Word Template / LaTex Template). All submissions will be reviewed double-blind, and as such should not contain author names, must be anonymous, no acknowledgments, affiliations, or obvious references. We expect that submitted papers may be available on public pre-print servers such as ePrint, arXiv.org or SSRN. We welcome such submissions.

Important dates:

- Paper submission deadline: April 3rd 2020 (4pm GMT+1)
- Author Notifications: May 8th 2020 (4pm GMT+1)
- Camera ready version deadline: May 22nd 2020 (4pm GMT+1)

Program Committee Chairs:

Univ. Prof. Dr. Matteo Maffei TU Wien
Pedro Moreno-Sanchez TU Wien

Program Committee Members:

Edgar Weippl SBA Research
Andrew Poelstra Blockstream
Stefanie Roos TU Delft
Dr. Marko Vukolić IBM Research
Dr. Arthur Gervais Imperial College London
Bernhard Haslhofer Austrian Institute of Technology
Ethan Heilman Boston University
Philipp Jovanovic EPFL
Prof. Dr. Rainer Böhme University of Innsbruck
Joseph Bonneau New York University
Dr. Christian Cachin University of Bern

Pi Network is a new cryptocurrency that you can easy mine with your Phone without using battery.We still very early so dont waste time and start mine now.Remember btc was worth 0$ in the early days.Developed by a team of Stanford PhDs and graduates.Download the Pi Network app from Play Store or APP Store and add my Invite code lebougas to join Pi Network.Start mining before the next halving.